NVDA, GOOGL, and AMZN Are the Dot-Com Boom — But With Actual Money This Time
Social sentiment is buzzing around AI infrastructure plays as IBD drops the 'we're not in a bubble' argument and The Economist drops the 'yes we kind of are' counter-punch

Ticker Ratings
Investor's Business Daily fired the shot heard 'round the fintech Discord: the current AI-driven NASDAQ run — up roughly 11-12% year-to-date — is NOT your uncle's dot-com bubble. The key difference? $NVDA, $GOOGL, and $AMZN are printing gigantic profits, while Pets.com was printing business cards. IBD argues we're still early innings, with AI barely touching medicine, biotech, and workforce productivity — which is either very bullish or the plot of a dystopian Netflix series, depending on your vibe.
Meanwhile, The Economist is playing the skeptic with back-to-back data center takedowns. Ireland's data centers now consume 30% of national electricity, up from just 5% in 2015. Maine voted to ban new hyperscale centers. Utah is staring down a project twice the size of Manhattan demanding 9 gigawatts. That's not a server rack — that's a small country. The backlash is real, and it creates regulatory overhang for anyone building the physical AI stack.
Reddit and X are still firmly in the 'NVDA to the moon' camp, but the smart money is quietly watching whether the infrastructure opposition movement becomes the next ESG — an annoying headwind that compounds over years, not quarters. Either way, if AI hasn't hit medicine yet, somebody's going to get very rich when it does.
Want the picks behind these posts?
Three AI models grade every call against the S&P 500 — wins and misses published. Free forever.
Create a free account