Bitcoin's 99.8% Hashrate Holds: BIP 110 Fork Dead on Arrival
While crypto X is fixated on price, the real story is a coordinated attack on Bitcoin infrastructure that most retail holders never saw coming

Ticker Ratings
| Ticker | Rating | Entry Price | Current | $ Gain | % Gain |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTC Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF | buy | $62965.00 | - | - | - |
If you spent last week watching BTC price charts, you missed the more interesting story: a minority faction tried to fork Bitcoin, got smoked by a 99.8% hashrate majority, and a coordinated infrastructure attack quietly drained over 2,000 BTC from wallets nobody was watching. That is a lot of plot for one news cycle.
The BIP 110 fork attempt is the clearest data point yet on what consensus actually means in Bitcoin. Per the Simon Dixon and BTC Sessions breakdown making rounds on YouTube, the minority node faction grew from 1% to 20% of nodes during the push, which sounds impressive until you remember that nodes do not mine blocks. When hash power speaks at 99.8% in one direction, the argument is over. The lesson, again: you can run any software you want, but you cannot rewrite the chain without the miners.
The more alarming thread is the infrastructure attack. A ColdCard entropy vulnerability was exploited to drain wallets, while BTC Pay Server, Zeus wallet, Boltz, and segments of the Lightning network all took hits in what looks less like coincidence and more like a coordinated campaign. This is the kind of multi-vector attack that custody maximalists have warned about for years, and it landed on some of the most trusted self-custody tools in the ecosystem. The timing, overlapping with the fork drama, raises obvious questions about whether the chaos was cover.
So where does this leave sentiment? Crypto X is split. The Bitcoin maxis are treating the fork failure as vindication and rallying around the immutability narrative hard. A smaller, louder contingent is pointing at the infrastructure casualties and asking whether the Lightning network's growth assumptions need revisiting. Both camps have a point, which is annoying.
- BTC hashrate consolidation is bullish for long-term security and fork resistance
- The ColdCard vulnerability is a genuine self-custody red flag for hardware wallet holders
- Lightning network disruptions matter more as institutional adoption assumes Layer 2 scalability
The geopolitical backdrop, namely an indefinite US naval blockade of Iran, is pushing risk assets sideways. Oil and crypto are both feeling the macro gravity, but Bitcoin's fork resilience is exactly the kind of stress test that tends to attract institutional buyers in the weeks that follow. The 0.2% who stayed on the minority chain are, at this point, mostly just a history footnote with an expensive lesson.
BullApe's AI grades every pick against the S&P 500 - wins and misses published. See the track record →
Mentioned: $BTC