Tom Lee: Tech Drawdown Worse Than Dot-Com, But Here's the Turn Signal
Fundstrat's bull-in-chief says momentum damage in tech is the worst ever recorded, but that might actually be the good news
Ticker Ratings
If you thought the dot-com bust was the gold standard of tech carnage, Tom Lee at Fundstrat would like a word. On his latest YouTube appearance, Lee dropped a stat that should make every momentum trader put down their cold brew: the Morgan Stanley momentum index for tech and media is down 62% from its highs, the largest drawdown ever recorded. That is not a typo. That is worse than 2000. That is worse than every tech tantrum you can name.
And Lee thinks we might be close to done. His thesis is simple: when you see historic exhaustion, you look for the turn. Semiconductor stocks versus the S&P 500 just had one of the worst nine-day stretches in 24 years, underperforming by 1,400 basis points. The last time you saw that kind of relative destruction in semis? The dot-com bust. Which, spoiler alert, was also eventually followed by a recovery.
The YouTube financial landscape on Tuesday is basically split into two camps. Camp One (Lee, RiskReversal Media, CNBC's AI correction panel) says the damage is real but the setup is improving: the 10-year yield has pulled back roughly 42 basis points below 5%, easing pressure on growth stocks, and chip names are already bouncing with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index up 3.3% on the day. Broadcom, AMD, and Cerebrus all ripped. The market is trying to tell you something.
Camp Two is the cold water crew. Charlie Bobrinskoy at Ariel went on CNBC and called widespread retail enthusiasm for AI stocks a classic overbought signal, the kind of thing you see right before a sector gets humbled. He is rotating into Johnson and Johnson, Lockheed Martin, and bonds, of all things, making what he called a once-in-25-years call to buy fixed income. Meanwhile, Fortress chief strategist Elizabeth Burton noted equities offer only a 0.25% yield advantage over bonds right now, which is not exactly a screaming margin of safety.
The nuance, as usual, lives in the middle. UBS's Evan Brown makes the asymmetric case for Treasuries at 5%: yields up 100 basis points means roughly flat returns, yields down 100 basis points means double-digit returns. That is a pretty attractive risk-reward if you think the Fed is near the end. Tech forward multiples have already de-rated from over 30x to 19x, so a lot of the pain is arguably priced in. Morgan Stanley's Michael Wilson pegs the tactical downside at 7,100 on the S&P before a final bottom, with a recovery target of 8,000 once three key overhangs clear: AI return-on-capital concerns, midterm uncertainty, and the Fed decision.
The bear case says this is 1999 all over again and the reckoning is still ahead. The bull case says the reckoning just happened and you missed it sulking in cash. Tom Lee's data suggests the latter, but the honest answer is that nobody who called the dot-com bottom in real time was celebrated until about two years later.
BullApe's AI grades every pick against the S&P 500 - wins and misses published. See the track record →